On point 3 yes, totally, more V4V shows are needed for sure. With all your experience of putting them on so far, do you find they are working better being attached to bitcoin conferences or as a standalone thing? Is it better for them to have their own identity and be live-streamed etc away from a conference? Is there a diminishing return in getting the same artists to repeat largely the same set at the same venue to largely the same audience, just like when a small band is trying to break through but needs a bigger audience? Should we try to work together to create a set of venues with V4V gigs that artists could move round in a sort of self organised tour? Or should people work together and book more flagship music venues and get artists to travel and hope the venue name excites a bigger livestream audience?

Replies (1)

When they're attached to conferences we certainly get more donations from the room. We just need more of everything. Normal shows, conference parties and we are working on doing some sessions just to test all the latest tools. There is no right way or wrong way. You just have to do something. This community is great though. Everyone wants to see us succeed, so the support is humbling (from all over the globe)