Login to reply
Replies (5)
psst..it's not the religion part that is the danger. it's the "country" part. Guns aren't dangerous until someone picks it up. There are plenty of countries that are authoritarian without religion, but a religion without an enforcement mechanism is powerless.
People believe in government just like religion- perhaps more so
Indeed - the "most dangerous superstition", as Larken Rose has written.
Yes, statism itself is the dangerous religion. It grands the (imaginary) right to coercion / initiation of violence, while the others don't.
The other religions are just used by the state to divide, fearmonger and do their evil war games. If we wouldn't have these religions, they would find something else.
You can't believe that statism is a dangerous religion, and that you should donate to a politician at the same time. This is a massive contradiction.
Friendly advice: Get all the contradictions out of your head. They are a result of toxic statist programming.
Nuances are just excuses for contradictions......


deeznuts
[nostr note by John Smith]