Replies (44)

Kendy's avatar
Kendy 2 years ago
You think a child should expect flawless content safety from clients less than a year old dev’d by underpaid and understaffed teams accessing a relatively-brand-new immutable protocol? Will is not responsible for parenting children. There is zero implication of expected child safety here.
Kendy's avatar
Kendy 2 years ago
That looks like it requires the note authors to opt-in to that tag? Correct me if I’m wrong pls
Diego Valley's avatar
Diego Valley 2 years ago
There is an option in settings to not show images automatically. I think it works for videos and for people you don’t follow
It doesn’t solve it, as I still have no idea what’s behind the blur and would be playing coinflip pretty much
damus is also 17+ and has blurred images/videos by default. I don’t know how people expect that a browser will be able to police the internet. Maybe when AI is good enough to detect β€œwoman fucking a dog” in realtime on-device.
Oh, didn’t know it was 17+ on App Store, explains a lot πŸ€—
Kendy's avatar
Kendy 2 years ago
It’s effectively useless for these contexts while you have to trust the note author to opt-in. Maybe the exception would be good-faith adult content creators. Better than nothing I guess
No it was my idea, damus web implemented it first. This nip author just codified it. It just doesn’t solve the problem of always screening β€œbad” content from users.
Default avatar
nobody 2 years ago
Why not just creat AI "dog videos" with appropriate disclosure and stick behind a paywall? Just a #bimbos idea
Default avatar
nobody 2 years ago
You're misinterpreting laws
Kendy's avatar
Kendy 2 years ago
Lmao. I heard those relays track their IP addresses and send them juice boxes and crackers
Default avatar
Nebula 2 years ago
"How to advertise for Damus" :) πŸ•πŸ©
↑