Thread

Why comments, I think a volume should not have 30041 in it.

Comments in reply to the wiki article, itself. What is a volume?

Yes, perhaps it's better than the merge request 818 kind volume or tome a set of books, Genesis for example

no Genesis is not a volume, but maybe you understood what I meant even if I explained myself badly

Genesis is a "book". The "collection" (I think that is what you mean by "volume") would be "bible" or "old-testament" or "pentateuch" or "torah", and they have no directly-associated `30041` events. One event for Genesis could have all of those collection labels, so that anyone could find it with them. Collections aren't `30040' events; they're more like book-specific labels. Only the actual book contains sections, usually the content within a chapter. "Bible" translates to "library". It's a set of books, and different churches include different books in the set. The Old Testament content overlaps with the Torah, which is the Jewish library.

ok, yes yes. It seems that the Table of Content is broken or at least for me in Alexandria I will call volume or tome 30040 which contains only 30040 nostr:naddr1qvzqqqr4tqpzq0s66re6t57pyfzakaug23ky8t0rm97xuprvt98kq97ddn2pv35sqyvhwumn8ghj7enjv4jkccte9eek7anzd96zu6r0wd6qzxmhwden5te0w35x2cmfw3skgetv9ehx7um5wgcjucm0d5q35amnwvaz7tm5dpjkvmmjv4ehgtnwdaehgu339e3k7mgpzpmhxue69uhkummnw3ezumrpdejqzyrhwden5te0dehhxarj9emkjmn9qythwumn8ghj7mn0wd68ytnndamxy6t59e5x7um5qyghwumn8ghj7mn0wd68yv339e3k7mgqxdj8ymfdvf5j6argv5kky6fdw35x2tt0d3jz6ar9wd6xzmt9de6z6argv5kkymm0dvkk7e3dvajkuetnd9esrz7vuw

Yes, it's broken. I was waiting to implement this bookstr macro, and include that in the release containing the fix.

Ah, I see what you mean. That the book-level should only include 30040s, to make the structure more standardized, with 30041s only under the chapter-level. I updated the wiki page a bit with stuff like: _This corresponds to a 30040 event that SHOULD only contain other 30040 events._

I changed the "book" level and "B" tag to "title" level and "T" tag, to prevent confusion with the "book::" prefix, and to keep it more generic (it won't always be a book title). nostr:npub1fjqqy4a93z5zsjwsfxqhc2764kvykfdyttvldkkkdera8dr78vhsmmleku nostr:npub1ty3ftnetpxnlj42lgwkmwdxta69gfm5f9mfljvmwdgymvsf6pkuswhxq4p

"F" is too abstract. "B" is too specific. I was also thinking "P" for "publication", but I went with "T" for "title", as it is the most clear and universally-applicable.

You had suggested > T, B, c, v, V and I went with > C, T, c, s, v Collection, title, chapter, section, version. I left out B, as that's using the term to define the term.

so in this highlight it could say give me a citation and then the wiki client has to verify