I mean I agree that’s part of it. That’s why we designed #[3]​ to rely so much on the social graph. I think there is a space for content warnings and reports and then a vetting and response to those reports. Be that a relay operator or group of users. Then I could choose to use a moderation list but that’s my choice. Relays could choose what they’ll host. The assumption amongst many bluesky users is that the company making the protocol will be able to provide a trust and safety regime similar to a centralized platform.

Replies (1)

Will nos social solely be using this 'social graph' method? Or will it also do a bit of moderation? Maybe it seems to me like Nostr sort of needs a transparency of clients's (and relays?) political views lol. Where does my client stand on topic x. I don't want them to censor me. Or is this off? I'm very likely wrong cos I don't know anything