thank you, i do want to hear more, yes. another question i have now is: you're considering writing a proof of concept for a ursf, but since you're aligned on the anti spam topic why not instead propose a bip that does not have the two parts you dislike?

Replies (1)

> why not instead propose a bip that does not have the two parts you dislike? Why not both? If I do not like X it seems wise to help prevent X from happening And if I *do* like Y it seems wise to also help ensure Y happens