You didn't name them. Rationale for raising OP_RETURN was discussed many times in hundreds of places and it never was about allowing new shitcoins or spam. It also in effect doesn't allow anything new of this sorts. I don't see how NACKing something translates to being compromised. As for gaslightning and pure misinformation, it's just your information bubble

Replies (3)

BitcoinIsFuture's avatar
BitcoinIsFuture 3 months ago
I am aware you are not seeking the truth because you are a spam supporter too. Is it Jameson Slopp influence or another one, you know that best. See the reason why compromised Core devs refused fixing the inscription spam - PR being "controversial" But the compromised Core devs pushed OP_RETURN as if it is not controversial. image Here some inscriptions spam resulted from the compromised Core devs actions. And we have now porn video in OP_RETURN too. image