Thread

Zero-JS Hypermedia Browser

Relays: 5
Replies: 3
Generated: 22:53:17
You didn't name them. Rationale for raising OP_RETURN was discussed many times in hundreds of places and it never was about allowing new shitcoins or spam. It also in effect doesn't allow anything new of this sorts. I don't see how NACKing something translates to being compromised. As for gaslightning and pure misinformation, it's just your information bubble
2025-11-04 21:41:26 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent 3 replies ↓
Login to reply

Replies (3)

I am aware you are not seeking the truth because you are a spam supporter too. Is it Jameson Slopp influence or another one, you know that best. See the reason why compromised Core devs refused fixing the inscription spam - PR being "controversial" But the compromised Core devs pushed OP_RETURN as if it is not controversial. image Here some inscriptions spam resulted from the compromised Core devs actions. And we have now porn video in OP_RETURN too. image
2025-11-04 21:47:27 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent 1 replies ↓ Reply
Here, refresh your memory. nostr:nevent1qqs2sa68pl6dsahmhe3af628rlxalnsm8khkzf7slus84xcu5j6gk8gppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qyg8wumn8ghj7mn0wd68ytnddakj7qgkwaehxw309aex2mrp0yhxummnw3ezumn9wshs2tpl20
2025-11-04 21:51:13 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent Reply