People don't like AI art
Nostr devs like AI art
Nostr devs aren't people
Login to reply
Replies (12)
what Nostr devs like it?
This nostr dev despises all fads and viral anything.
The image are easy to recognize. I don't think you get realistic images without several hundred or thousand parameters.
LLMs can be loaded with advanced shit but the parameters cover a tiny fraction of the semantic map required to not make shit up. Or lie.
I would say, given no big stuff interferes they can run trillion sized models on a single board by 10 years. But I think there will be a lot of other things, war, space weather...
What is this reasoning? It's indisputable...!
Vitor Pamplona uses AI generated banners for profiles that have none.
It's so bad lolcry
nostr:npub1r0rs5q2gk0e3dk3nlc7gnu378ec6cnlenqp8a3cjhyzu6f8k5sgs4sq9ac what do you think?
couldn't he leave that space empty?
Yes, he could, easily. He could even pay a human artist to create a banner. (What a crazy concept, I know.) He choses not to.
are you a troll account or a serious person? why do you have a note defending rape in your profile?
Are you talking about this funny post that I boosted?
nostr:nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzq2thawghmxnayh57dgvpgk9z4q9t8e2mn2lfry33e4uy3el0d4s6qythwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnwdaehgu3wvfskuep0qqsw2wypupqcue6l0ehuff574fppur54accg45ryy8fsq0mv3pm7phsjcfw97
That's clearly a parody of this classic piece of Reddit humor:
Neither argument should be taken seriously. Obviously bobcats and bears aren't friendly just because they are cute and fluffy, and obviously someone shouldn't rape women just because they find women sexually attractive. The dichotomy makes the jokes funny.
It's hard to characterize my account as "troll" or "serious". I have lots of things I want to say, but I will often try to make my points in the form of an edgy joke. Partially I am just maintaining a certain vibe, ("Scoundrel") but I also genuinely dislike making a point if people are unlikely to disagree, or if it makes me look good. I don't like it when I come off as signaling even the smallest amount of virtue, even if I'm sharing my actual position. It makes me feel inauthentic.
For example, I much prefered boosting the above post by nostr:npub199m7hytanf7jt60x5xq5tz32sz4nu4de4053jgcu67zgulhk6cdqd2c4lz instead of just coming out and saying "sexual attraction does not justify rape," even though that's the whole point of the joke. I felt it was more authentic to present a scenario where that conclusion is obvious than present the conclusion itself. Though if there's something I post and someone doesn't get it then I will always gladly help them to understand it, either by making the joke even more over the top and obvious, or by spelling it out like I'm doing now.
Also I'm an actual pedophile and I post on Nostr because it's the only platform where a normal person and a pedophile can have an argument without either side having to worry about their conversation being censored. The only funny thing about that is that most pedophiles online don't give a shit what ordinary people think. Anyway, does that all explain well enough to you what my whole deal is?
Neither argument should be taken seriously. Obviously bobcats and bears aren't friendly just because they are cute and fluffy, and obviously someone shouldn't rape women just because they find women sexually attractive. The dichotomy makes the jokes funny.
It's hard to characterize my account as "troll" or "serious". I have lots of things I want to say, but I will often try to make my points in the form of an edgy joke. Partially I am just maintaining a certain vibe, ("Scoundrel") but I also genuinely dislike making a point if people are unlikely to disagree, or if it makes me look good. I don't like it when I come off as signaling even the smallest amount of virtue, even if I'm sharing my actual position. It makes me feel inauthentic.
For example, I much prefered boosting the above post by nostr:npub199m7hytanf7jt60x5xq5tz32sz4nu4de4053jgcu67zgulhk6cdqd2c4lz instead of just coming out and saying "sexual attraction does not justify rape," even though that's the whole point of the joke. I felt it was more authentic to present a scenario where that conclusion is obvious than present the conclusion itself. Though if there's something I post and someone doesn't get it then I will always gladly help them to understand it, either by making the joke even more over the top and obvious, or by spelling it out like I'm doing now.
Also I'm an actual pedophile and I post on Nostr because it's the only platform where a normal person and a pedophile can have an argument without either side having to worry about their conversation being censored. The only funny thing about that is that most pedophiles online don't give a shit what ordinary people think. Anyway, does that all explain well enough to you what my whole deal is?
yes, I was unaware of the reddit meme