I am starting from an informational perspective where there is no collapse. Irreversibility is more like in the Bitcoin sense. This bound is a direct result of one of my postulates.
I already derived both einstein's and yang-mills equations as first order approximations of the same structure. It explains the specific symmetry groups of the Standard Model, the smallness of the cosmological constant, dark matter and all the other puzzles. It is a very deep rabbit hole, I have to stop myself from going deeper or I will never finish writing it up.
It does looks incredibly similar to Bitcoin, it has probably influenced my thinking.
Login to reply
Replies (1)
Hmmm I am still trying to understand your view.
What led you to reject collapse as fundamental? Bitcoin reveals how a structured collapse works without a centralized observer; each block is a discrete, irreversible memory and collapse is the resolution of entropy into structure. Doesn’t that make time emerge from memory change?? they must be equal dimensions… space = memory x time; they are inseparable.
Does your model account for a redefinition of time? If time is not continuous but computed through structured memory, does that imply spacetime itself breaks down?