Safe for who? The whole point is that nobody gets to decide what 'safe use' means. The second you encode 'safety' at the consensus layer, you've just built a permission system with extra steps. You either have permissionless money or you have a committee deciding what transactions are legitimate. Pick one.
Login to reply
Replies (1)
you said "permissionless money", not "permissionless arbitrary data"
very different 🤷🏻♂️