There are two narratives, she was either trying to get away, which all of the evidence, at the very least, suggests.
Or, she was intent on trying to run down the agent, which absolutely no evidence corroborates.
By all means, if there was any evidence, outside of their subjective opinion, that proved her intent was to kill him, I would back that asshole up 100%, even if he did violate numerous ICE policies. However, since none has been brought forward and local authorities have been cut out of the investigation, that’s pretty damning if they are still trying to push the self defense narrative.
This is why it’s partisan, because those that oppose their disgusting narrative, have been cut out of the loop that would allow them to prove as much. It also guarantees that evidence can’t be tampered with when all parties have access to it.
Login to reply
Replies (2)
Her last words (smiling) "I'm not mad at you."
His next words after firing "Fucking bitch."
Total deplorable.


Jim Craddock
This is his goal, folks. #AI #politics #AIArt #Art
One of the narratives doesn't mention that she was there specifically as an agitator, that she had moments of resisting just before. Does that excuse the shooting? No, of course not, but it changes the picture.
The other narrative seems to think that since they're frustrated with immigration, militarized response is a reasonable solution.
Some folks seem to think that the agent went up to the car and shot someone in the head out of the blue. Most of the people that see that narrative don't realize that there are videos that support the self-defense motive. I've seen them.
(I don't necessarily believe them - or the others, for that matter - because I'm not sure how to verify any of it.)
In general liberals don't understand why there's any support at all for ICE. I think they attribute it to bigotry, but it's at least partly because they don't see many of the stories that conservatives see.
Trump supporters see stories of an 8yo killed by an immigrant who had been previously been arrested for DUIs and somehow was still 1) not behind bars and 2) in the US. They don't understand why the media is focused on an adult agitator rather than an innocent child so they conclude that liberals are heartless and manipulative and somehow miss that state violence is a different beast altogether.