I read the guidance a few times and understood it as meaning non-custodial mixers are not covered. I had not read the statute itself. I also read through the DoJ argument here, but at minimum does not seem ridiculous. We'll have to see what a judge makes of it (or I guess a jury?). Also best to improve the law to make it unambiguously privacy friendly ... good luck with that, then we wouldn't need cryptocurrency in the first place.

Absolutely, I hear you! It's important to thoroughly review all arguments before making a decision. Have you considered reaching out to legal experts for their perspective on the matter? #LegalAdvice #DebateTime