When it cones to mining it's very nuanced game, and after the great China ban everyone is allocating the capital very strategically across many jurisdictions. Stratum V2 pools are the way to go Braiins (Slush Pool / Braiins Pool) — ~9–11% — HQ: Prague, Czech Republic; primary regions: Europe (Czechia), global server nodes Foundry USA — ~12–14% — HQ: USA (New York); primary regions: North America (U.S. data centers), global nodes Antpool — ~10–12% — HQ: China (Ant Group); primary regions: Asia (China, Central Asia), global infra F2Pool — ~9–11% — HQ: China; primary regions: Asia (China, Singapore), global nodes I don't mind seeing the current proverbial 1% being dominated with bitcoiners in two decades. For transactions we will have to use many solutions, lightning, ark, bitvmx and each will have its downsides but it's easy to imagine a massive volumes anchoring to the layer1, outcompeting currently popular jpegs phenomena bloating utxo set We have over 60 different implementations for NOSTR relays, and only 3 for bitcoin node, it would be nice to see more than three. To me bitcoin is a monetary network, for data storage with public key cryptography they can use NOSTR + blossom servers, nostr badges are cool.

Replies (3)

Russo's avatar
Russo 2 months ago
I missed one of the most important points here and it is BIS and if you know how money works you know than when BIS talks all counties that you mention above obey. There are only 3 exceptions countries, but don't expect that they will not align the same, because if they want to keep doing international businesses and they all want, they all again have to shut up to BIS and obey. https://www.bis.org/publ/bisbull111.pdf
Russo's avatar Russo
## Bitcoin Reserve: How govs will steal from you to build the reserves? The evolving landscape of Bitcoin is increasingly influenced by state-level tracking and regulatory frameworks. As governments develop systems to monitor and control Bitcoin transactions, the implications for users and the market are profound. ### The Trackability of Bitcoin at State Level Bitcoin operates on a public ledger, making it **pseudonymous**. While individual users can maintain privacy through various techniques, state-level entities can effectively track transactions. - **Chain Analytics**: Firms and government agencies can analyze transaction flows and link them to real-world identities, especially when users interact with regulated services. - **Revelio Insights**: The Revelio paper illustrates how network-level observations on ligthning network can reveal custodial holdings and flows, enabling state-level attribution. ### The Custodial vs. Non-Custodial Wallet System A new regulatory framework is emerging that distinguishes between custodial and non-custodial wallets: - **KYC/AML Compliance**: Regulators will require that wallets and custodians interoperate only through channels that enforce Know Your Customer (KYC) and Anti-Money Laundering (AML) rules. - **Isolation of Non-Compliant Wallets**: Wallets that do not comply will be unable to transact with regulated entities, effectively isolating them from the broader financial ecosystem. ### The Mechanics of Blocking and Seizing Funds States are developing mechanisms to control Bitcoin transactions, which could lead to the seizure of funds: - **Transaction Failures**: When a user attempts to make a purchase, if the transaction fails compliance checks (e.g., BIS), the funds are blocked. - **Government-Controlled Reserves**: Blocked funds will be redirected to a government-controlled Bitcoin reserve, effectively allowing states to seize assets under the guise of regulatory compliance. ### Market Implications for Users The implications of these developments for users are significant: - **Reduced Autonomy**: Users relying on regulated exchanges and custodial wallets will find their assets increasingly linkable and subject to seizure. - **Increased Friction**: The need to comply with KYC/AML regulations will create barriers for users, limiting their ability to transact freely. ### Last but not least The combination of state-level tracking and a bifurcated wallet system creates a plausible pathway for governments to seize Bitcoin. As compliance becomes a requirement for interoperability, users must navigate a landscape where their assets are at risk of being redirected to government reserves. This shift fundamentally alters the original vision of Bitcoin as a decentralized currency, raising critical questions about user autonomy and financial freedom. #bitcoin #nostr #grownostr #monero
View quoted note →
Russo's avatar
Russo 2 months ago
BIS control all central banks of the world, when that law is passed, you don't have where to scape, like in the Chinese case
Russo's avatar
Russo 2 months ago
also, every dev knows how they will enforce this, but no one has the courage to tell you besides the little ones that still care about where bitcoin ends like me.