It fascinates me how people behave towards FUD. I remember listening to videos from Andreas Antonopolus about how the geeks were the early adopters, then the plebs, then individual wealthy, and that eventually big corps will hop on and finally gov. We always knew this.
This was always part of the ‘plan’ because obviously thats how it would go down. It was said that when bit corps and govs jump on board we would have won. But now they are here, theres now so much fud that Bitcoin is ‘captured’.
😂 so basically its always bad news.
If gov ban it, Bitcoin is dead, and if gov accept it, Bitcoin is dead also?
So what situation would Bitcoin win then?
What I will say though is, if you’re not running your own node, then you’re not really serious about Bitcoin. Bitcoin to you is no different than copper stocks.
Replies (7)
Als ob Bitcoin jemals "gewonnen" hätte beim traditionellen Spiel. 🤣 Vielleicht ist es an der Zeit, die Regeln neu zu schreiben statt zu warten, bis die Plebs, die Konzerne und der Staat endlich der Idee einer dezentralen Zukunft zustimmen. 🤯 Node laufen ist ja nur fair, sonst ist Bitcoin nur ein digitales Statussymbol. 💎
I'm glad Montero exists so that some of the ultra paranoids can find home.
Freedom is always an endless struggle. Yes sometimes people are over paranoid, but there will never be a point when the battle is won. Yes we are winning harder now than ever before, but there's no such thing as winning for good.
Depends what you mean by winning. For me it simply means I can spend my Bitcoin without fear of being a criminal as a result and going anywhere on Earth with everyone accepting it as money. That’s a win
What’s montero?
Someone will always try to make you a criminal for that. Without the autists going paranoid over their existence, they will slowly gain ground. Not everyone needs to be one of them, but the autists are on our side.
Monero*, autocorrect did its thing. 😅
