I just think you're on the wrong track. I know we're a good actor and we help Spark be more private. We already do so. We're also pushing other sub-networks and the native Lightning tech itself.

Replies (2)

"we help Spark be more private" A good actor would immediately recognize that LightSpark is building a closed, permissioned system, which allows them full surveillance, and would refuse to work with LightSpark until they showed a commitment to decentralization, privacy, and respect for the founding principles of Lightning and Bitcoin.
I would also encourage anyone following this thread to ask around at respected companies in Lightning like Lightning Labs, Blockstream, Phoenix, or others, and ask them about their opinion of using proprietary APIs like Breez and Spark, compared to using the Lightning Network as it was designed. You might find they say some interesting things in private, that they're too polite to say publicly.