Isnt Liquid just a corporate Shitcoin? They own your BTC, you own their L-Token. They can censor your transactions on their network. It is not decentralized, the network is owned by a couple coporations. Why should we go that path at all? Whats the big difference to using WBTC on Ethereum?

Replies (2)

WBTC is one entity, Liquid is a contractual consensus of financially unrelated entities who would need to block you by majority. Also, lightning payments backed by Liquid channels don't go on chain, so they don't have much say about payments (this is very different to for example wallet of Satoshi, they can do lightning payment level censorship, Liquid not so much). Also, since it's one Lightning network, you can get out through independently operated bridge, not through their multisig. Yes, it's not Bitcoin mainnet, but it has pretty good balance of fees vs privacy vs distribution of decisions for many smaller channels that would otherwise not be possible.
Also, there's not one "we". Someone wanting to dollar cost average 3$ per month to escape extreme poverty has a very different opinion on what is a corporate shitcoin and what is useful to them.