At the activation height, all miners will ask themselves whether they should follow the rules of the soft fork, or stay with the bitcoin consensus rules
Then they'll realise that they should follow the soft fork, because their block will then be valid on *both* chains
So basically, just after the activation height, and just before there really is a split, miners have an incentive to apply the soft fork rules
To counter this, people could create a large number of high-fee transactions with large OP_RETURNs, to encourage miners to reject the fork from the very start
Login to reply
Replies (1)
Users and/or miners could also deploy a URSF/MRSF that rejects signaling blocks, forcing the split. (Or maybe just use some kind of invalidate block or check point… though I think that might be a bit more iffy.)