A bunch of months ago I considered whether we should have it on nip01 and discarded the idea precisely for this reason
It just so happens that the most common use case of nostr rn is the social media / broadcast model, but that’s far from the only case. Outbox applies very much for that case and very little for other use cases.
Login to reply
Replies (1)
This is genius. I've been thinking about various other applications that wouldn't operate well on the network as-is. I'm thinking beyond "social media protocol" and into "decentralized and distributed (platform-less) cross-application persistent identity, media storage and retrieval, and information security". Replace and tear down gatekeeping for MLS (real estate for those not familiar), for community governance (more secure and psudonymized voting, likely with a different npub), for commercial networking and markets with tiered profile structures, etc.
Having the option to branch the protocol to specialize into other applications that would simply not work well on a social-first paradigm would make these other ideas actually feasible.
Another reason I think this is the future is because AI is taking over so many spaces, but AI can't fake digital signatures, and the signing paradigm of Nostr is a shield against it.