without limit, bitcoin is neutral, with limit not. your man/woman comparison is exactly the other way around. staying neutral towards this topic and let others decide, which is what bitcoin should be. lets others decide and do its thing, why would bitcoin need code to participate in a man/woman debate? i don't want bitcoin to do that. same with what is spam and what isn't.

Replies (2)

BitcoinIsFuture's avatar
BitcoinIsFuture 4 months ago
Also we don't debate man and woman. We debate spam. I guess you can't identify spam in your email. But the majority of the people can. The man/woman analogy is just a comparison to our current issue.
This kind of plasticity has no end and literally doesn’t work in reality - it’s the crux of men pretending to be women and white people claiming aboriginality. As Allen said, you can argue about what morals to prioritise, but trying to be neutral on such questions is ridiculous. You’re not in fact neutral, because there is no neutral. By attempting to be neutral you’re actually choosing the side of men being women and Bitcoin being 1s and 0s for arbitrary data storage; you just don’t realise that’s what you’re doing because you’ve not thought enough about morality. image