Ah sorry folks - looks like the task already has a worker. be faster next time! View quoted note →
Demo Patron
You have been assigned! Since the escrow has been funded and you are assigned to the task, please review the requirements and complete the work. Get in touch when you're done and the arbiter (looks like that's @vinney...axkl ) will review the work and pay you - if you do a good job.... image https://npub1cyqjvgjver3v9affrr64tmsetxwyf0jf4sumsnmj3zsel5md4ynqku9kka.shakespeare.to/task/naddr1qvzqqqyz0ypzpaemdkg5kd4ghplca60xhwxrah8dpekxpg4p6d9tl7tr5t38kqfuqqdhqmmnwskkzttwda6x2tt0dckkummnw3ez6vpcxsurwdqup92dt
View quoted note →

Replies (9)

lol. well first mr Bullish needs to do the damn work. and the client needs to work properly to get him paid 😆 ...and one day this reputation paper trail can be computed by @david 's GrapeRank on Brainstorm - and you won't have to keep it in your head.
No, in the design this is the same entity. the **Patron** (who created the task) can (and usually _should_, probably) be different than the Arbiter/Escrow holder. There might be good arguments for optionally splitting out the escrow holder from the person who is judging the work. that could be a proposed change to the Catallax NIP - or perhaps a fork and we can let the market see which version does better.
lol nice! there's nothing about the protocol that precludes that kind of behavior. the Patron could always "assign" a worker after the fact. (this is why you keep protocols low on opinion, high on optionality. let the clients and users and market sort out use cases)
Default avatar
Demo Patron 4 months ago
"Best solution" to posting a note that says "Marco". What will the free market solve next?!?!