Where is the escrow held?

According to the task details (and the documentation on https://catallax.network), @vinney...axkl is the arbiter and escrow holder. can you trust that guy...?

Dang I dunno. If @The Bullish ₿itcoiner gets paid then I'm all in on this Vinney guy.

lol. well first mr Bullish needs to do the damn work. and the client needs to work properly to get him paid 😆 ...and one day this reputation paper trail can be computed by @david 's GrapeRank on Brainstorm - and you won't have to keep it in your head.

Interesting. I assume an arbiter and escrow holder can be different? And both can get a small fee for the service?

No, in the design this is the same entity. the **Patron** (who created the task) can (and usually _should_, probably) be different than the Arbiter/Escrow holder. There might be good arguments for optionally splitting out the escrow holder from the person who is judging the work. that could be a proposed change to the Catallax NIP - or perhaps a fork and we can let the market see which version does better.

Many workers, retroactive funding for best solution 🤙

lol nice! there's nothing about the protocol that precludes that kind of behavior. the Patron could always "assign" a worker after the fact. (this is why you keep protocols low on opinion, high on optionality. let the clients and users and market sort out use cases)

"Best solution" to posting a note that says "Marco". What will the free market solve next?!?!