actually a smart choice by primal actually if you ask me. changes nothing about the protocol.
Login to reply
Replies (6)
As a primal user, you will not see the posts of users that primal censors. Even if you never mute that user, ALL primal users will not be able to see that user’s posts if primal chooses to filter those posts out of their caching relay. You’re not seeing notes from the relays. You’re seeing notes from the primal caching relay. This isn’t very different from centralized Twitter. The saving grace is that you can use a different client to see a censored user’s notes. But how would you know that user is being censored? How would you know if they’re partially censored? And if you have to navigate out of primal at some point to see notes that they don’t want you to see, why not just use a different client entirely right now?
I don't think it's a smart choice for Primal to censor speech while refusing to censor childporn.
That actually makes primal look really bad.
When have they refused to censor childporn?
lolita drunk again🍷
beggar journalist no zaps from @primal 😱🍷actually
They are censoring everyone that complains about the childporn and scammers but not censoring the childporn or scammers.
It's very suspicious
I am not seeing the same. Would be very surprised if they actually refused to censor people sharing childporn
Who are the people that are sharing childporn or spam that they are not censoring?