Thanks for always speaking to me like Iโ€™m 6. Genuinely. ๐Ÿซ‚๐Ÿค— โ€œItโ€™s not about beating them. โ€œ Good answer, friend. Thatโ€™s not how the argument was presented to me. When i did research others were basically saying that it was knots against core.โ€ โ€œ Itโ€™s better to have two dev teams creating software. It decentralizes the network. More the merrier should be the ethos. โ€œ Cool ๐Ÿ˜Ž but they donโ€™t yet have the #POW nor the time factor #Bitcoin currrently has. Right? The arguments arise from the disingenuousness of their argument. Fax ๐Ÿ“  โ€œAs I see it, 3.0 is profiting from spam -or attempting to. Fine let them. Itโ€™s an open protocol. โ€œ Here we go. ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚ โ€œMy gripe is only with the bullshit argument they put forward. ๐Ÿงก๐Ÿ‘Š๐Ÿป๐Ÿปโ€ Okay big brain ๐Ÿง  how can we use your tradfi experience to take down wallstreet? I said what I said ๐Ÿ˜‚โœจ๐Ÿ˜Ž

Replies (1)

Its not about beating them. -Knots doesnโ€™t care about core. -Core doesnโ€™t like knots and itโ€™s obvious when you see the ad hominem attacks. Itโ€™s all good. Everything is fine. The mere fact that Knots grew as quickly as it did shows a great immune response that Bitcoin is gonna be fine. Leave it at that lets all sing Kumbaya
โ†‘