We don’t know what really goes on behind closed doors. That’s the issue.
Why do people in positions of power sometimes make very odd decisions that are seemingly not incentive aligned?
There’s a lot of subterfuge, leverage and agendas we’re not privy too. Saylor could absolutely have relationships / alliances / agendas that necessitate deception that nobody can see or even imagine.
I don’t necessarily believe this, but I also don’t necessarily believe he is necessarily honest and forthright in his public facing commentary / actions either.
I remain skeptical despite perceived incentives, as I know there can be different hidden incentives and pressures.
Login to reply
Replies (1)
I agree with this, but you could say this about any company and any counterparty.