How does Luke’s character or even intentions have any impact on the argument over changing default mempool policy?

This is BSV levels of cope. Luke's significant role in knots brings into question the whole motivation behind convincing people to run knots. Ostensibly, it was to allow people to police their mempool, but to drag what is now 20% of the network along in some bizarre CSAM moral panic is a bridge too far -- if the texts turn out to be true.

Oh yes please continue to tell me how retarded I am, that I can’t check my own software and don’t know how to use Bitcoin. Your arrogance and elitism sure are doing the job 🤣

Lmfao dude >Ostensibly, it was to allow people to police their mempool, but to drag what is now 20% of the network Seriously, do you think people who are running knots are all following orders from Luke or something like that? Have you considered the possibility that we are independent Bitcoin users who are simply flagging in opposition to the core v30 mempool policy change? 👁️👁️

>Ostensibly, it was to allow people to police their mempool, but to drag what is now 20% of the network ***ALLOW***???? You mean the ability to set mempool filters for op_return? YOU MEAN LIKE ALL CURRENT NODE SOFTWARE DOES???? L M A O !

Least they could’ve done is have this exchange on Nostr and not Twitter ffs

B-b-but muh reach. Muh algorithm.

The fact that pedophiles are all rallying around core and attacking knots tells me that Luke did a good thing

Most of you talk like you’re in a cult.

How so buddy? Any illogical appeals to authority? Any strange language redefinitions?

When are the privacy advocates sharing their own messages publicly so that we can have more fun?