I agree with you that it's usually in powerful institutions best interest to lie.
but when someone's alternate explanation does not explain basic observational data,
and requires about a million people over a few hundred years to cooperate in a conspiracy,
it just isn't plausible.
it's just entertainment for them.
Login to reply
Replies (3)
exactly.
it seems ridiculous to someone from the 17th century to imagine people walking around a ball without tumbling off into the firmament
but if it explains the data, we better try to find a force thats holding them on the ball.
People in the 17th century didn't believe the earth was flat. The earth has been treated as round by the educated since the 5th century BC. It is fun to paint the medieval period as backward, but there isn't much truth in it.
It is like the myth that Columbus was trying to prove the earth was round. But everyone already knew that in his day. What he was trying to prove was that the earth was small enough to sail west to India.
He had trouble getting a ship, because people who could math knew that it was a longer route.
I generally think that human history is much longer and more complicated than we think.
as you say, I expect there have been people that have known that the earth is round for several thousand years
but the point that I'm making is that people were still having this discussion, just like this, in the 17th century