To be clear, Cullen didn't present it as a "who's Satoshi documentary", and gave us no indication he was looking for Satoshi until the very end. I interviewed with him something like 4-5 times. Only the very last time did he bring that up.

Replies (26)

Wait. I am shocked that while engaging with a "journalist", their actual objectives were obfuscated and true intentions never directly made clear. And by "shocked", I mean not shocked at all......
Just own it at this point and change your name to Satoshi Nakamoto
Cullen was trying to make everyone uncomfortable with long pauses, silence and stuff. Stupid mind games
But your should tell everyone to follow you on nostr. lol. Make a ‘special’ announcement
There is something to the conversations between Todd and Dillon. Who is who? Or are they one?
My advice: Go cave diving in Mexico for the winter with no comm devices except for emergency services. Stay well Peter. Sorry they shined this light on you, man. You didn't deserve that.
bruidbarrett's avatar
bruidbarrett 1 year ago
what are your thoughts on BIP: 347 unlocking zk proofs on Bitcoin?
frenchHODL's avatar
frenchHODL 1 year ago
that was totally my assumption, dude probably said it'd be a documentary about Bitcoin and we're going to talk about Satoshi (no big deal)
Kim's avatar
Kim 1 year ago
Cullen’s approach is intriguing. By not framing the documentary as a quest for Satoshi from the start, he allows for a deeper exploration of the broader implications of Bitcoin and its creator. This method opens the door for nuanced discussions about technology, privacy, and decentralization—issues that resonate far beyond just one individual's identity. It's a reminder that the story of Bitcoin is not merely about a person, but about the ideals and transformations it represents.
the axiom's avatar
the axiom 1 year ago
it's ok, we know you are satoshi but we will keep pretending we don't