Thread

Zero-JS Hypermedia Browser

Relays: 5
Replies: 5
Generated: 07:27:38
GrapheneOS news boring tiday, here is an OpSec of the year 2025 late contender. This is an update of that guy who falsely claimed GrapheneOS was compromised by law enforcement. He posted a document showing a warrant for **premeditated murder** and claimed we were to blame despite zero evidence of a device being exploited or even data of ANY device being accessed. https://x.com/GrapheneOS/status/1997126386968903972?s=20 The content they post across social media regularly implicates themselves in crimes they supposedly commit. They're now claiming that despite previously claiming GrapheneOS is insecure, they were using it and blame it for supposedly being charged with premeditated murder. The whole thing appears to be a very badly run smear operation targeting GrapheneOS. They're trying to portray GrapheneOS as heavily used by criminals while also portraying it as insecure. Despite claiming it's insecure, they supposedly keep using it and getting caught due to it. In their new story, they claim to have fled Belgium due to premeditated murder charges. They blame GrapheneOS as they claim the only way they could have been caught is Threema messages on the device. They claim the duress PIN feature many people have tested didn't trigger. They've been making claims about GrapheneOS supposedly being compromised or insecure for a while. It's quite strange for them to now come out with the claim that they were relying on it to store incriminating messages for plotting a murder. Incredibly strange thing to admit on X. If all of what they're saying is taken at face value, then they appear to be a career criminal who scams for people for a living and has gotten themselves into something darker. They have atrocious legal representation. If what they've said is true, they should go back to Belgium and turn themselves in. They've made it pretty clear they have incriminating evidence on their phone they tried to wipe but misremembered the duress PIN. They ASSUME their phone was exploited to get it with no proof. They claim to have an active investigation into themselves for murder. They claim to have tried to destroy incriminating evidence and fled the country. If it's real, their opsec approach is extraordinary. We think it's someone investing many months into smearing us this way.
2025-12-06 03:35:22 from 1 relay(s) 4 replies ↓
Login to reply

Replies (5)

When this person originally submitted the warrant, they sent a cropped version with the dates incorrect. See below for the original that got saved. They deleted the original tweet with it. We don't even believe the document is legitimate. We are just assuming worst case that it is (note: no mention of device access). They claimed a GPU bug made the days wrong. image I know his lawyer is PISSED image This guy's logic of "I got arrested = phone data was accessed" is hilarious despite (according to them) the phone having ALL security settings maxed and was never used outside. Whatever evidence they have it CLEARLY isn't data on a mystery phone. image
2025-12-06 03:47:40 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent Reply
With the aggressiveness they are attacking the GrapheneOS project its obvious they are terrified that you will disrupt their plans to stifle free speech and open communication. It's so very sad that western civilization has descended so far.
2025-12-06 04:16:31 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent Reply