No. Oversimplifying or misrepresenting my specific statement, or generalizing it into an extreme or distorted version (suggesting “anything goes” or implying it condones something bad) to make it easier to attack would be a strawman fallacy My statement means that specifically the pursuit of generosity justifies the means of free and fair markets to fund that generosity. …specifically. Although free fair market capitalism is “justified” by many of it’s inherent benefits.

Mom: “Sure Honey that’s great if you want to use the car!” Teenager: “Well, Mom said it would be good if I used the car to go anywhere and do anything. So it’s her fault I am in jail for robbery in Vegas.” :) Of course not any ends by any means.