Thread - Nostr Hypermedia

ODELL odell@primal.net 1 year ago

OPENSATS FUNDS DEVS BASED ON THEIR PROOF OF WORK ON OPEN SYSTEMS. WE HAVE PROVIDED OVER 120 GRANTS. NONE OF THEM ARE WORKING ON “SHITCOINS ON BITCOIN.” IRONICALLY SAYLOR’S OWN IDENTITY PROJECT RELIES ON INSCRIPTIONS. GRANT RECIPIENTS PROVIDE QUARTERLY PROGRESS REPORTS TO THE BOARD. THESE ARE USED TO ASSESS RENEWAL REQUESTS.

↑ Parent

Replies (12)

DRE shss@nostrplebs.com 1 year ago

I wasn’t talking about OpenSats or arguing it doesn’t take measures to ensure their grant recipients are vetted. I was just pointing out that no strings attached is not governed by definition. Malice is not needed to break things. The path to hell is paved with good intentions after all.

brah 1 year ago

Open sats board has a lot more power to decide on where bitcoin goes than any of us individuals is saylor’s point. And he is right

2 replies ↓

MadMiner1340 1 year ago

*cough* ecash *cough* *cough*

High Heel King hhking@blitzwalletapp.com 1 year ago

Why dont we all just donate straight to devs then?

PABLOF7z _@f7z.io 1 year ago

The fact @Michael Saylor won’t go on @CITADEL DISPATCH but rather discusses a weak strawman speaks volumes

4 replies ↓

It's Moro! itsmoro@stacker.news 1 year ago

i havent watched it yet, does Peter do a terrible job? kinda why i havent watched

1 replies ↓

₿harat bharat1@nostrverified.com 1 year ago

Totally agree. Sounds like a waste of Bitcoin block space project.

Des Imoto マキシ desimoto@nostrplebs.com 1 year ago

What needs so much development?

zorbaR 1 year ago

Gd

negr0 negr0@hodl.ar 1 year ago

🫡🫡

bitcarnicoin bitcarnicoin@iris.to 1 year ago

Fighting over opinions and ideas is exactly as it should be. This is good for Bitcoin.

npub1page...c5c3 1 year ago

Why are you defensive and feel opensats was implicated in this discussion?

↑