I'm not a victim. I'm am a nearly professional pot-stirrer. ๐Ÿ˜ Sure. He exaggerated. Who doesn't from time to time? You've latched on to that pretty hard. But you can't claim that about me since I've been pretty consistent that I don't think this was premeditated based on what is currently known. I'm not morally superior. I'm simply being, IMO, consistent. I'm not even attaching any morality to a majority of my statements since that's a mess to discuss and a morass to argue. He is my buddy, but we disagree often. But, we're still friends, or at least pretty decent faceless internet acquaintances. You pointed out his degree inconsistency. He accepted that, if you'll care to remember. So what's your beef?

Replies (1)

Ok so his exaggerations are excusable and mine are some egregious assault on the art of debate as a whole? The contradictions are insane. I've latched onto that because it's clearly contradictory in the nature of both of your arguments. You're not being consistent. And the misogynist shit proves it. I said it to another guy that you're lambasting over his take on the entire situation. You're both just doing halo effect bullshit because it's a woman that got shot and it's plain as day. I really don't care about any of this at all. I just want the hundred million people that are in my country that shouldn't be out. If some retarded dyke is going to park her car in the way of that and then drive toward someone trying to get them out then I mean my advice is probably going to be shoot her. This shit has gone on long enough. I don't care that it's a woman. I don't care that she has kids. And I certainly don't care about you guys playing white knight about some woman that would exchange your life for some cotton candy.
โ†‘