Default avatar
nobody 2 years ago
Hal, Adam & Satoshi are the only ones I can think of that played a part in engineering BTC. BTC was almost perfect, if not perfect, at inception. That’s the point I was making about Adams quote from his time trying to make it “better”. MSTR & Nostr are no different in the overall scheme of things. Underlying BTC remains unchanged and is better for that. IMO

Replies (1)

I get all that and I agree -- I lean conservative as far as BTC "development" goes. I don't even think we need Lightning (unless it is as a means to enable anonymous transactions, as it seems to do with Cashu) because I don't think we need to add any "features" to what Bitcoin does very well -- store of value and unalterable timechain. I do think though that there's a big difference between developing ON Bitcoin and just using BTC the asset.