BIP 110 doesn’t fix SegWit and the arbitrary discounting of bits stored on the node. Speaking of the word arbitrary. SegWit broke the original protocol constants of 21M/1MB/1Block and the economical relationship of sats:bits. We devalued and attacked the nodes starting in 2017; op_return was the last domino. You can’t hate arbitrary data when you arbitrarily discount certain data and have severed yourself from Satoshsi’s original protocol. Let’s agree there is a problem; I’m saying BIP110 is not the proper solution. You still are mispricing the bits of your node and still allowing the chain to grow faster than Satoshi defined. If we are to take his words as gospel, we should take his code and defined constants as gospel too. We need to stop double spending to make Bitcoin fit our individual definitions of “money”.