It didn't make any arguments for me. It cited a study. Which is what he asked for. I made the argument, it backed it with the facts. What deserves scorn is your inability to retort the facts presented and instead play this game of "well you just used ai and bad words" It's a petty character assassination and anyone that's not retarded can see through it.

Replies (2)

No, you made crude insults and copypastaed your google ai response afterwards as if it was both an argument on its own and if its results were indisputably correct and unassailable. It was neither, in the unlikely case that you care to examine what you copypasted. Why should I spend my time typing out arguments to a person that clearly does not recognise the value of argument, or even what an argument is? You continue to accuse others of what you are yourself guilty of, and you have clearly misunderstood what a character assasination is, assuming of course that those were your words and not more ai puke. You offer nothing of value. Still solely worthy of scorn.
↑