It’s really not complicated, though it’s one of those things all the genius bureaucrats can think of a million complex solutions for without ever touching the logical core.
The natural and normal thing is for men and women to be attracted to each other, to become exclusive and start a family against the backdrop of an always slightly dangerous and uncertain world.
The man provides security and income. The woman provides warmth, care for household, husband and children. Both gain stability and quality of life, and feel proud and content of their contribution. Because on average it works well, families have 3 kids or more.
This is the normal state. What are the man things that break this?
1. Gender roles being distorted through feminist and other (homo)sexual propaganda. The man becomes a sort of woman and the woman becomes a man. Chemistry breaks
2. The government obstructing the provider from providing by running the economy on fake printed money, inflating assets and products versus salaries. Further distorting gender roles as women are now required to work. Wrecking families in the process.
3. The government further obstructing the ability to provide by stealing part of that salary, and also taking over the role of provider and protector itself, all the while importing millions of people from lower IQ countries that pose a danger to the natives, therefore increasing the need for said government protection.
Note - I am merely observing. No issues at all with women working, but I see that more as individual cases, we all have our personalities and preferences.
I am merely observing that to improve birth rates, you need to get rid of feminism, gay propaganda, taxes, fiat currency (or not run it recklessly), immigration. The solution is easy enough.
Africa and Muslim countries have the highest birth rates. They tick all or most these boxes. Mostly poor countries on top.
Rich western countries that want higher birth rates simply need to figure out how to be less gay, fake/fiat, feminist and brown.
