Default avatar
ihsotas 3 months ago
It’s not about easier or harder. Spammers don’t care how hard it is to put stupid moneys or dogs or whatever the fuck on chain. They don’t even care how much shit costs. Higher Expense just means rarity to their twisted little brains. 1. It’s not very hard to do this to begin with. block 273,536 contains a 14.4kb image of Nelson Mandela embedded across multiple transactions using pay to fake public keys. This has no limit. 2. Limiting op_return just pushes more bloat to the utxo and is objectively worse for the chain in the long run. Bitcoin is a bad data storage system but it is designed is such a way that you can’t stop people from doing stupid shit. Making it possible to do stupid shit in a less harmful way seems better than making it only possible to do maximal harm regardless of your intentions. Wishing for people to be perfect angels is not how bitcoin operates.

Replies (1)

Supposing what you say is true about spammers preferring rarity tied to higher expenses, even offering them a cleaner and cheaper way to spam will not convince them to forfeit the luxurious way of doing it, that is, with fake pubkeys. So if that premise is valid, it contradicts your conclusion. And if it is not valid, it does validate my point of only leaving the most expensive loopholes accessible. No, people are not angels, people are a gross sum of praxeological individuals that work by profits and incentives. More options to send spam inevitably means more spam.