OK. I say that you can't just perpetuate mantras that carbon dioxide is a 'proxy for life' without considering the complexity of life. Stating that is simply clumsy, if not misleading. It is a sophisticated lie, period. Don't f%#@ing use it please, it's daft. Moreover, the lie is commissioned by fossil fuel industry. Shame because I like petrol cars. 😜 They're great pieces of engineering work. Other points to consider (it could go forever): 1) I was born at 300 ppm, now is 423. It means (look into research where ginko biloba fossils were used) that most of tipping points are crossed. 2) 1000 ppm makes us anxious. And current levels of the gas kill certain marine life due to acidification (Great Barrier Reef). 3) If your 'point' is that is natural, that's OK. It's not me who is going to face these 'beneficial and natural effects' of the 'life proxy'. Nor that I care about my children - simpletons, who seem to be as gullible as most of the sheeple. 4) Aren't you afraid more that the cattle you eat farts to much methane, so the nasty climate activists deprive you of that? 😂 5) Don't you think that it makes me sick too to listen daily yookay bs? 6) We're on the same page, but I don't agree with that simplification because it's a skewed narrative. Cheers! EoT