Thread

Zero-JS Hypermedia Browser

Relays: 5
Replies: 13
Generated: 03:02:23
Login to reply

Replies (13)

Yessir I can. In this paper, Soros makes the case that the bipolar Cold War order has collapsed with the Soviet Union's demise, creating a vacuum prone to disorder, particularly in Eastern Europe where what he calls “closed societies” rooted in nationalism and ethnic principles pose threats not through external aggression but internal instability and the need for enemies, risking regional chaos as seen in the Yugoslav wars. He goes on to further point out that the primary post-Cold War danger is the reversion to authoritarian, nationalist "closed societies" rather than ideological communism, and that NATO, must evolve beyond its defensive role against the Soviet threat to actively project stability eastward by promoting open societies based on “democracy”, market economics, rule of law, and individual rights. He basically envisioned and NATO’s current role as part of the military industrial where missions have shifted toward "projecting stability" through partnerships, crisis management, and out-of-area operations (e.g., Afghanistan, Libya), while heavily emphasizing “democracy promotion” and open society values in candidate countries. Definitely worth checking out for anyone interested in understanding how NATO became what it is & how people like Soros direct its missions through their NGOs. Past is prologue so to speak.
2025-11-19 05:09:21 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent 1 replies ↓ Reply
Fascinating indeed! This paper is like 35 pages and it really puts a lot in perspective when it comes to how the proof of weapons network functions and some of the tropes they use to justify or veil their activities. I definitely got better insight into the current Russia-Ukraine conflict since the admission of Ukraine into NATO was one of Putin’s redlines
2025-11-19 08:26:59 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent 1 replies ↓ Reply
“The proof of weapons network” is a term I only just came across So interesting Many an evil has been conducted in the name of “god” and “being the good guys” Something else I came across recently was the results of the post WW2 Nuremberg trials, and how it set a precedent that just “following orders” wasn’t a legal justification for murder etc In spite of that, look where we are all these years later. A 4th turning. A information war. A hyper-inflation. A medical apartheid. A ruling elite using the guise of “experts” and “democracy” to exert their power as the “proof of weapons network” So much to learn. How best to protect yourself and your family?
2025-11-20 06:51:45 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent 1 replies ↓ Reply
“Proof of weapons network” struck a chord when I heard Simon Dixon use it and I immediately adopted it 😁 You are right about the precedent set by the Nuremberg trials but I think part of the reason why the world is still in a mess, despite the legal precedents that were set, is that these trials didn’t take out the architects. The real masterminds got away with it and they used the foot soldiers as fall guys. Nothing emboldens evil more than a lack of accountability. Thanks to operation Paperclip, a lot of the mad scientists became US gvt employees or contractors. That’s how we ended up with stuff like MK ULTRA, Tuskegee Experiment to name a few. The best way I can think of to protect yourself and your family; is to start off by reducing your dependence on the state and its systems. From their fiat money to their energy. Communities of like minded individuals could build their own citadels, like a Galt gulch or how the Amish roll. This is a multigenerational project and is easier said than done.
2025-11-20 07:10:26 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent 1 replies ↓ Reply
Now those are the best first steps. Detaching your money, health, energy, education and food from their system is the easy part of the sovereignty stack. The more complex bits to figure out are things, like how to stay online as the internet gets more gated and protecting your privacy while doing so. Do you homeschool your kids?
2025-11-20 08:10:57 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent 1 replies ↓ Reply
My kids are still very young, 5, 3 and 1, and yes we homeschool But really that is a grand term for saying that they spend most of their time with mum and dad Will look to get more sophisticated with them as they get older and really believe in the power of self-directed learning
2025-11-20 08:21:14 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent Reply