Thread

perhaps try talking to a physicist that study this?

I’m trying, but it’s harder than I thought. It seems they get a lot of spam from people sharing nonsense theories. I assumed I was well connected, but academia feels completely orthogonal to my business-oriented personal network.

Always has been. nostr:nevent1qqsdftcy0che70vtjd46aneysssleju2y2er0zksksz7euef4lckd6spz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduhsygpm8fpdxn8s59qz6xx4xmya9tpwk8rqrx532wl9wzzvs9jaryhry5psgqqqqqqs2jlq9u

With a 15-year-old unused since BSc in physics, I will read it. 😂

I wrote it with a 15-year-old unused since BSc in engineering physics, so I guess it is doable 😂

you should get Curt Jaimungal on this https://curtjaimungal.substack.com/ . Looking into new theories of everything is his thing.

Fair enough.. 😂

Judging by some responses you've received on nostr, this isn't surprising. Full of fallacious logic and ad hominem attacks, and expectedly coming from "experts" who still haven't understood that peer-review is largely captured and unlikely to provide any significant breakthroughs as the system now functions to primarily maintain funding for their junk science and shame anyone who challenges their beliefs as having a mental illness.

maybe you could pay some reputable people to review it for you and attest it deserves the attention of others in a world of infinite AI-generated text and limited human time money is likely the best solution

I would gladly do that, but unfortunately it is not how their industry work. Theoretical physicists are not used to getting this kind of offer.

build and they will come

or not, but it must be built regardless

That was one of the reasons I started TeXstr as an open source project related to my Atomic Signature Swaps project, so that people could create bounties for peer review. I will have to pause it for a while to focus on my theory right now, but I intend to get back to it as soon as I can.