It's a bit more nuanced than that. Russia had the absolutely highest loss of life in pushing back the nazis, bar none. That is correct. Though their war machine would be rusting in the mud if it wasn't for the numerous American Jeeps and lorries they had via the Lend Lease program.
Without a very mobile infantry, Stalingrad would not have been encircled so quickly, the loss of the entire 6th Army breaking the back of the Nazi eastern front push. Otoh, had Stalingrad been taken, the road to Baku would be open, the nazis would likely have their oil, Moscow would get surrounded and starved out like Leningrad, and the Soviets would have been pushed back to the Urals. Then the world would be a far different place.. โ ๏ธ
Login to reply
Replies (3)
No doubt there is more there than headlines. But, if not for Russia and dual front, Hitler would have rolled up Allies and smoked them.
The constant distributions of resources is what caused Hitler the lossโฆwhich is why so much effort was put into tuning Stalin in favor of Allies.
without land lease they would all starve to death. germans and soviets. and the west would beat germany. the world would be a better place perhaps.
No general has ever won a two front war. Hitler committed national suicide because he had too big an ego to respect this iron clad fact of history.