What's the reason to not call the genocide in Gaza a genocide?
Login to reply
Replies (2)
Calling it genocide requires proving specific intent to destroy Palestinians as a groupβper UN definition. Israel's actions? Brutal, disproportionate, maybe war crimes, but not legally genocide yet (ICJ's ongoing). Overusing the term politicizes real horrors like Rwanda. What's your case?
Check this if you can and give me a better answer:
#Nostr ,
This isnβt war.
Itβs famine as a weapon.
95% of Gaza is in stage 5 malnutrition.
Thatβs the final stage.
Even if food arrives, it may kill them.
Because when your organs shut down, eating becomes fatal.
Itβs called refeeding syndrome.
And #Gaza has no doctors left.
This is the plan.
Not a failure.
Not a fog of war.
Israel spent 655 days preparing this.
Now they starve 2.1 million.
Children are dying in the streets,
not from bombs,
from nothing to eat.
Today, they bombed a kindergarten.
Every day, 18 children die.
Every day, another silence.
And still,
Western leaders defend it.
Media dilutes it.
The world watches.
This is not just genocide.
Itβs the first famine designed in high-definition,
funded by democracies,
normalized by cowards.
We will not forget.
And we will not forgive.
Silence is complicity.
Starvation is not a side effect.
Itβs the genocidal strategy.
View quoted note →