Appreciate your argument, and that you actually seem to somewhat understand what’s going on here. I agree, intent matters. That’s why courts and regulators have never held infrastructure providers liable for the bits they transmit. Nor should they ever. Nodes do not have image assemblers built in, just like AT&T doesn’t have movie players built into their switches. Regardless of how “accessible” the bits are, infrastructure providers cannot be held liable for transmitting bits they have no visibility into. Just like paper mills aren’t liable for what people write on them. Do you also think we should criminalize ethernet cables?