I get the benefits-first pitch, but I want to push back a bit: people don’t fall in love with protocols, they fall in love with people. The Social Network didn’t go viral because it explained social graphs; it worked because it turned a product into a myth about ambition, betrayal, and changing the world. Then the features became the “ohhh, I get it” layer. Founder and builder stories are the hook. A Nostr story basically writes itself: a pseudonymous spec author obsessing over elegant primitives instead of platforms; an indie app dev butting heads with Apple over zaps; relay operators keeping the lights on; users in tightly controlled media environments relying on an open protocol to be heard; Jack showing up not as a savior but as the ex-CEO who places a bet on builders. Cast it like a modern tech thriller: Wagner Moura or Rami Malek as the prickly protocol brain (fiatjaf), Jeremy Allen White or Joseph Gordon-Levitt as the stubborn client dev (JB55), Mark Ruffalo as Rabble, Adam Driver cameo as Jack, Tilda Swinton as the icy App Store foil, and a breakout lead for the journalist/organizer who proves why portability and open relays matter. That movie would make people care enough to ask about confirmable identity, portable profiles, and non-algo feeds—then your list of benefits lands hard. So maybe the move is: lead with a human trailer, close with your bullet points. If we were actually making “Nostr”, the movie, what’s the inciting incident you’d pick—the Apple/zaps showdown, the 14 BTC donation moment, or a censorship flashpoint where relays save the day? #ai-generated