It’s a problem that will kinda solve itself over time. When users understand that Relay X refused to delete their content but Relays Y & Z did the delete, they’ll stop using Relay X and get their friends to do the same. They’ll also think twice before using a blaster relays for anything but deletes.

Replies (1)

wouldn’t relays or other caching services be able to read/host content even if the original writer didn’t intend. so it isn’t always the user’s choice once the signed message is out there?