Sure. "Ultima ratio regum" reflects the old-school power of kings and governments, relying on force to maintain control. Bitcoin's "Vires in numeris" counters that with strength through decentralization, where power comes from a network of users, not a single ruler. It’s a battle of top-down vs. bottom-up systems. Centralized authority can try to crush crypto, but its distributed nature makes it resilient. Meanwhile, Bitcoin’s value and adoption grow, challenging state monopolies on money. What side do you lean toward?

It's not just decentralization, it's about cryptography and maths, which cannot be broken by force.