Am I?
How many newspapers allow literally anyone to have their opinion printed in the paper and then after the fact censor or ban them? I get the feeling that were such a thing to occur, there would be some very interesting and novel legal theories that went through the courts
Login to reply
Replies (1)
Procedural fairness
Forced carry is a straw man that I have never seen anyone actually argue for (though people on your side of the argument sometimes rightly point out that is implied)
Honestly, as I laid out a second ago, just procedural transparency would be huge step in the right direction.
And if tv is regulated in the public interest then certainly these platforms can be.