I would strike a deal in the middle, where the expansion and contraction of the services is based on the need to the people in the area. So the fair should reflect this completely and not be a burden on the taxpayers. The same would go with people who drive on the roads that they should pay for the appropriate amount to be able to drive so much higher, probably collected through the yearly or monthly registration of the vehicle. This way, people make decisions based on the economy that they can afford and want to use and the rest of the taxpayers are not affected.
