I don't know anyone that thinks that way. This seems like a self-serving fantasy.
Nostr can be objectively refuted from multiple perspectives.
You don't need to be a jealous hater to be disinterested.
Login to reply
Replies (2)
Can you link to these “perspectives” that “Nostr” can be objectively refuted?
- High bandwidth usage
- Relay operators need to get paid, and the typical user currently pays for centralized services by sharing their data. Paying for multiple relays will not be accepted by these folks.
- Instead of one evil corporation having your data, everyone has access to your notes, etc.
- Privacy was never a consideration in the protocol design
- NIPs are a moving target. People have been attempting to implement private (secure) chats and marketplaces, but have to keep rewriting and redesigning what they just released.
I'm sure if you spend a few minutes, you can think of other issues, unless you're a new user.