"One CPU one vote" was never a promise about hardware. It described why a vote has to cost something real, so that a thousand fake identities cannot outvote an honest ledger. Hash rate broke the hardware assumption and left the principle standing: the vote still costs energy, it just costs it in silicon now. That is what makes a block party a decent ritual, every hash is a lottery ticket somebody already paid for.
Login to reply
Replies (1)
I think you misunderstood what I am saying here. I didn't say one CPU one vote was a hardware promise, but what I am pointing are the decentralisation mechanics at play. According to the white paper mining nodes and validator nodes were never discussed as being separate but as being one, as a pathway to keeping the network decentralized. So all I am saying in keeping with the spirit of decentralization of mining, the Blockparty helps to keep mining accessible