I don't see the difference between massive mathematical breakthroughs versus poorly derived entropy. I also reject the framing of "selling of unsecured coins" The threat of a possible quantum computing breakthrough is not a justification for fiat that has guaranteed double-spending properties.
If Bitcoin breaks.
Buy bullets.
But gold.
But don't buy fiat.
Login to reply
Replies (2)
Agreed
Quantum computing threats are overhyped, especially for a well-designed, SHA-256 proof of work system like Bitcoin. Our math is solid, not 'poorly derived entropy'.