Replies (29)
You believe in the legitimacy and utility of democratic constitutional republics and you consider this to be a substantially different stance from being pro-democracy? Really? Might want to rethink that.
You're trying to sell word salad as an intelligent argument and I'm not buying it. Take your shit somewhere else.
Just tell me one thing: whose property do you intend to seize or destroy in order to stop Iran's nuclear armament? Bodies are property too, mind you. Tell me exactly what you are advocating for, for clarity. Just Iranian government agents? Citizens too? American taxpayers? How much destruction is it worth?
Any amount to make them stop developing arms that can destroy large numbers of my fellow citizens and allies. I don't give a fuck about their people more than mine. Fuck off or get fucked off. I'm under no obligation to let a known enemy gain the ability to harm me.
Does that sufficiently answer your question?
Buddy… maybe go touch some grass.
It's not word salad. Either you support rule by coercion (statism) or you support personal responsibility and consent, holding everyone accountable to the same laws (anarchism). If you come from the classical liberal tradition and yet you are finding yourself confused by this, that's on you. You've got some work to do and no amount of intelligence will cure intellectual laziness.
Yes, it shows me that you are an intellectually lazy coward. Your resulting philosophical illiteracy allows you to be easily manipulated by whatever institution appears to be the strongest/smartest/quickest to annihilate what you fear. You support this rather than being driven by reason, curiosity, or any solid ethical foundation. You are a coward.
Shut the fuck up.
lol why ?
just sayin, all you head trippin niggers out there with your political cope mechanisms....
you got nothing when you got multiculturalism and the chaos that ensues....
niggers dont know what those words mean....
so, address the race issue in your western nations or you SHUT THE FUCK UP.
impotent faggot.
You're funny. I reject and actively fight against forced integration and "equity" at every turn, so maybe I just understand better than you.
good.
still dont understand why you told me STFU...
but thats okay.
you have a good one and keep fighting....
I just have a serious problem with racism, and this seemed both racist and irrelevant to the discussion at hand. If you are a racist, I vehemently disagree, but I agree with the part of the book premise that I read there saying that forced inclusion is terrible and should not be institutionalized - the Civil Rights Act has got to go (along with the whole federal government). Take care now, bye bye then.
racism is a fake term for faggots...
go fuck yourself bitch.
I am a racist until you realize that in-group preference is not hate but one of the highest forms of love and beauty.
fucking state educated retard.
nor was it irrelevant - perhaps you just lack the ability to take stock of reality and project forward 20 fucking years...
you got your order of operations all fucked up...
View quoted note →
I actually am not against some manifestations of ingroup bias. Again, you are oversimplifying and lumping me in with other people who I disagree with.
I only said if you are racist. I didn't assume you certainly were. Please stop assuming. I just don't know you very well, don't know the full story. Of all antiracists you've met, I'm probably the most understanding because I don't hide away from the reality of the benefits of real diversity... which are furthered by bias that SOME people call racism. I do not call a little bias in absence of further information racism. Words do not have intrinsic meaning, and when I say things, there's often a story behind it. I assumed the same of you. You probably have some really good points. I just wasn't in the mood, at the time you originally interjected, to go over them.
you need to get over your feminine/commie hybrid "thinking" - "you cant be rayciss"...
its so fucking gay dude. no one cares anymore.
racism is, contextually, awesome.
#gfy
by the fucking way, if you are REALLY against "racism" you are barking up the wrong tree here... try correcting the following shit before you get all morally uppity with me:
they started it. we will end it.
The War Against Whites: The Racial Psychology Behind the Anti-White Hatred Sweeping the West. – Ostara Publications
and btw its not my fault you are fucking black or descended from heart-eaters...
thats your burden.
This is a ridiculous take. I'm an ancap and I'm against the Civil Rights Act. If that's not good enough for you, you've got issues and really are racist.
you are black... admit it
Lol well I tried. I literally said that I didn't call you racist but you went nuts.
I love this
bro... i mean, how can you look at this and not fall into adoration of this chink?
you need to chill on the free speech policing - i dont care WHAT your fucking excuse is - racism, mysogeny, hate - go fuck yourself...
some of us are poetically and freedom minded and as long as there are virtue signaling idiots wlaking around doing communists bidding chipping away at free speech becus "racism" , there will be people like me who are willing to play the role just to keep that buffer zone between us and full blown totalitarianism ...
this guy is a hero.
You got me. I'm extra crispy bacon, just because I use a different definition of "racism" than you and you took it personally. I guess words have a lot of power over you.
herp derp.
Guess I used the wrong word, I'm sorry, what word should I say when what I am trying to convey is "if you believe in fallacious stuff, and I don't know whether that's the case, but if so, then I disagree with you."
Because that's literally what you got upset at, I wasn't even namecalling. But if that's an offense against your free speech, I'm sorry poor baby, I'm sorry nostr is not making you free enough and you need extra help. I'll just stop responding to you so you can feel better just like all those communists on Bluesky.
oh so now resorting to snarky concern trolling after being educated on the fact that you are using communist-derived (in order to nation destroy btw) - Nation -Natal ... get it yet you listless wandering homeless faggot with no allegience to ancestor or progeny cuz das rayciss...?
also "my definition" is different than yours aligns quite nicely with being a communist as well...
maybe all your railing against "intelligence" has taken its toll?